Plan where to recruit.
Understand every application.
Recruitment intelligence for your next intake.
Connected evidence for your admissions team.
Country and city intelligence. An explained recruitment mix. Daily monitoring against your chosen target.
See the planning example ↓Application assessmentIdentity, academics, English, financials and an adaptive GS interview, connected in one assessment.
See what the officer receives ↓UniReady Risk Optimiser
Start with the cities your teams cover and the enrolments you intend to recruit. Choose an Evidence Level objective or an exact planning score.
Explore market data alongside your university’s outcomes.
Set intended enrolments, minimum allocations and capacity for the cities your teams cover.
See which allocations increase or decrease, and why the recommended mix meets your chosen target.
Track the changing outlook and compare recruitment scenarios before committing to a plan.
A university planning example
| City | Intended | Recommended | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai China | 175 | 175 | 0 |
| Beijing China | 125 | 125 | 0 |
| Guangzhou China | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| Hanoi Vietnam | 100 | 165 | +65 |
| Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| Manila Philippines | 100 | 100 | 0 |
| Jakarta Indonesia | 80 | 80 | 0 |
| Surabaya Indonesia | 20 | 20 | 0 |
| Ludhiana India | 200 | 135 | −65 |
| Total | 1,000 | 1,000 | 0 |
All 1,000 enrolments retained. Move 65 places from Ludhiana to Hanoi. The other allocations remain unchanged.
This is the illustrative planning scenario used in the UniReady presentation. The modelled score moves from 2.67 to 2.449, within the chosen maximum of 2.45. The recommendation depends on the scenario’s outcome assumptions and allocation constraints.
A planning score is not an official provider Evidence Level decision or a prediction of an individual visa outcome.
UniReady GS-360
Recruitment plans bring applications. GS-360 checks the evidence behind them, so admissions officers can focus on judgement.
Passport authenticity, document validity and identity checks.
Qualifications, records and results against entry requirements.
Test verification, overall score and required component bands.
Sponsors, funds, income and loan repayment sustainability.
An adaptive AI interview based on the SOP, with advanced proctoring.
Cross-check interview responses with submitted documents and university policy. See findings for each document, ratings by category and an overall assessment, with the reasons and evidence behind them.
What is available? Is it sustainable? What does the evidence support?
Bank savings, fixed deposits and eligible education loans against tuition, living and travel costs.
Sponsor income, occupation stability, ongoing costs and education-loan repayments assessed for affordability.
Sponsor eligibility, ownership and sources of funds matched across records and checked against policy.
For a low-risk case, see what supports that conclusion. For a case needing review, see the inconsistency, missing evidence or integrity concern and the next action. The officer retains the admissions decision.
GS-360 in practice / Nadia’s sample case
Nadia appears to meet key requirements and her submitted funds cover the first year. The assessment continues beyond those headline numbers.
Follow the officer’s review from sponsor eligibility to income, funding, supporting evidence and loan affordability.
At first glance
Master’s applicant · Bangladesh
Identity, academics and English verified
Loan repayment coverage: 1.56×
on declared parent income.
Funding sufficiency depends on authentic records, reconciled transactions and continuing access to the money.
Based on detection patterns from past cases, Nadia’s sample assessment shows how each concern leads to a specific review action.
F01 / Cross-account reconciliation
Two sponsor statements, 30 pages each. Seven claimed transfers do not reconcile.
Eight credits of AUD 1,250 imply AUD 10,000 of support. Only AUD 1,250 matches an outgoing debit in the supplied records.
Next action: Obtain complete bank records and reconcile account, date and transaction references before accepting the claimed support.
F02 / Document integrity
A seal and signature appear as overlays in a PDF presented as an original scan.
The document structure raises a concern about how the claimed scan was produced. A digital signature alone does not establish fraud.
Next action: Authenticate the letter and fixed-deposit balance directly with the bank before relying on it.
F03 / Continuing access to funds
AUD 6,000 enters in four deposits, then leaves to the same party.
Narrations and account references connect the deposits and withdrawal. The balance alone would not explain the movement.
Next action: Establish the source, purpose and continuing availability of the funds before accepting them as sustainable support.
The officer sees why the case needs review and where to investigate. UniReady supports the judgement with traceable evidence.
Across our university partners / Over six months
Detailed investigations can take 30–60 minutes and still miss connections. The activity data shows the scale of checking that UniReady brings together for officer review.
About 100 working days at 7.5 hours per day. This is an estimated workload equivalent; remaining officer review and follow-up time have not been deducted.
| Activity | Count | Minutes each | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passport | 1,306 | 2 | 43.5 |
| Academics | 209 | 2 | 7.0 |
| English | 776 | 2 | 25.9 |
| Financials & work experience | 292 | 30 | 146.0 |
| GS interviews | 1,063 | 30 | 531.5 |
| Total | 3,646 | 45,232 minutes | 753.9 |
45,232 minutes ÷ 60 = 753.9 hours. At 7.5 hours per working day, that is 100.5 working days, shown here as approximately 100. At 20–22 working days per month, it represents around 4.6–5 staff-months of workload, distributed over the six-month reporting period.
The calculation uses 2 minutes for passport, academic and English activities, and 30 minutes for financial/work-experience and GS interview activities. The 30–60 minute investigation example above is not the basis for every activity. These are estimated manual handling times, not measured net time saved, headcount savings or elapsed turnaround. Multiple activities can relate to one student.
AIEC university pilot offer
A GS-360 pilot with your own applicant cases.
No assessment fee.Standard value: AUD 5,000
50 assessments at AUD 100 each.
This offer covers GS-360 application assessments. A Risk Optimiser demonstration or evaluation can be discussed separately.